PH – Inclusive Growth Or Inclusive Development, Zero Extreme Or Zero Poverty?
On Facebook
yesterday, Bruce Tolentino shared “The Philippines IG Inclusive Growth Story”
that is actually “a student competition on how the Philippines can achieve
high-income status with zero extreme poverty by 2040.”
From the
DoF website:
The Philippine Development Forum – Sulong Pilipinas: Hakbang Tungo sa
Kaunlaran is an annual consultative
conference that brings together different stakeholders from all over the
country. By establishing a strong partnership between the government and
different sectors – from business and development partners, to the academe,
youth organizations, and many others – Sulong seeks to build a truly inclusive
economy, and work towards a comfortable life for all Filipinos[1].
Zero
Extreme Poverty 20 years from now – Is that a realistic goal?
It is. But I don’t like such a realistic goal – I like the unrealistic goal of Zero Poverty! Why because if you Dream
Big, you might as well Dream the Universe.
Also: There is something I do not like in the concept of
“Inclusive Growth” – I want “Inclusive Development.”
Inclusive Growth is the result of Gross Domestic Product, GDP. In
effect, in GDP the poor are largely excluded as beneficiaries of the overall
economic growth. Else, we would not have any poor families today!
Inclusive Development is the result of Gross Domestic
Happiness, GDH. Differently, in GDH, the poor are both actors and benefactors
of themselves via their own labors.
Here is a
practical way of describing or presenting inclusive development – I am quoting Director
General of ICRISAT based in India and now PH Secretary of Agriculture William
Dar, in his Manila Times column of
Friday, 14 May 2018[2]:
Achieving profitability in the rice industry
will need collective action among smallholder farmers, meaning they should
organize themselves into cooperatives so they can go into block farming to
achieve economies of scale… and have bargaining power in the trading of rice.
Via cooperatives, the poor farmers enjoy inclusive
development, because their cooperatives are the merchants themselves and share
incomes that sustain the lives of the producers and their families.
GDP admits of classic individual merchants as
indispensable to the economy, who take care of their own welfare. Of course.
GDH admits of modern institutional merchants as
indispensable to the economy, who take care of the welfare of the merchants as
well as the food producers. In fact, the merchants are in effect the food
producers themselves, working through cooperatives.
So, in this
2020 student competition, via GDP, we are teaching the students to not think
beyond the current dispensation, to think only via classical economic thought.
We are encouraging our students to be
conformists, not alas, creative members of society!
The contest guidelines, available online[3], comprise
6 pages single-spaced. Too complicated. No cash awards mentioned. Nonetheless, if the first prize is P3 million, 2nd prize P2 million, and 3rd prize P1 million – those amounts will matter
much to the student groups who will become winners, but not much to poor farmers
who have always been the losers from obstacles to opportunities to options to
outputs to outcomes!@517
[1]
https://www.dof.gov.ph/index.php/advocacies/sulong-pilipinas/
[3]
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MUQN3F4Phv1o0ApeY-ZfjmpKH8IDYbDZ/view?fbclid=IwAR2mH_ojPVH0ju6nWNuoj2AFR9KTO69aPCJmHWM9oN7lwR8ap3CIoZ5SlL4
Comments
Post a Comment