Green Sugarcane Accounting – What About Green Sweet Sorghum?
In November 2016, out of the press came a book I edited, UPLB
Professor Teodoro "Ted" Mendoza's Green Sugarcane Accounting, with
the long subtitle, "A Pioneering Work In Accounting For Energy Use And
Carbon Footprint For An Energy-Efficient And Climate Change-Compliant Sugarcane
Production." If you don't know Ted, the "About The Author" says
of him:
He is a member of the
Philippine American Academy of Scientists and Engineers (since May 2011). He is
also a member of the Board of Trustees of the Philippine Employer Labor Social
Partnership Inc (PELSPI), as well as the Philippine Rice Research Institute
(PhilRice) representing the academic community in recognition of his incisive
analyses of food security issues, rice production systems and climate change
adaptive farming.
In the "Editor's Introduction," this was my last
paragraph:
This book is for
consciousness-raising as well as reality-assessing inside the sugarcane
industry, and outside. Much of it the results of research, it should completely
revolutionize the way the Philippines looks at how the sugarcane industry can
do itself justice and at the same time largely contribute to climate change
adaptation.
I was happy editing and producing that book, up to the pdf
file.
Today, 3 years and 3 months later, I am thinking of another
and sweeter thing: Sorghum bicolor,
the botanical name of sweet sorghum. I first became acquainted with this crop in
2007; I wrote in my blog iCRiSAT Watch, “Sugar
Is Sweet. Sweet Sorghum Is Sweeter[1].”
According to now-retired MMSU professor and scientist pioneer sorghum grower
Heraldo Layaoen, sugarcane has 14% sugar content while sweet sorghum has 23%[2]. (image
above from The Better India[3])
Not only sweeter than sugar, but the yield of sweet sorghum
is higher in the Philippines than in India, its source country, being introduced
to the Philippines by then-Director General William Dar of International Crops Research Institute for the
Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT, based in India (who is now PH Secretary of
Agriculture). This imported crop loves it more
in the Philippines than where it came from!
Comparing now: According to Ted, sugarcane yields 60-65
tons/ha. At 14% sweetness, 60 tons is 8.4 tons of sugar. According to trial plantings
of Mariano Marcos State University, MMSU, in Batac, Ilocos Norte, sweet sorghum
yields 40-45 tons/ha. At 23% sweetness, 40 tons is 9.2 tons of sugar, higher
than sugarcane. Not only that. In 1 year, with sugarcane you harvest once,
while with sweet sorghum you harvest twice.
So,
sweet sorghum is my sweet crop twice valuable!
Now I ask: Why are we not planting sweet sorghum?
There is another consideration: biofuel. Let me quote myself
from 13 years ago – “The Inconvenient Truth, It’s Origin Is Western[4]”:
Sugarcane ethanol is
the Brazilians’ choice, corn ethanol is the Yankees’ choice. Sweet sorghum
ethanol has lower sulphur and higher octane and is cheaper to produce than
sugarcane ethanol (Belum VS Reddy et al 2006, Sweet Sorghum, ICRISAT brochure), as well as is cheaper
than corn ethanol[5]).
So,
sweet sorghum is my smart climate crop thrice over!@517
[1]
https://icrisatwatch.blogspot.com/2007/02/sugar-is-sweet.html
[2]
https://icrisatwatch.blogspot.com/2007/10/seeds-for-my-sweet.html
[4]
https://icrisatwatch.blogspot.com/2007/02/inconvenient-truth.html
Comments
Post a Comment