It’s Time PhilRice Grow More Than Rice, Including Grow Farmer-Friendly Knowledge
Am very glad to note that PhilRice won the 2019 PH Government Best Practice Focus Award
from the Development Academy of the Philippines, DAP[1].
According to Donna Cris Corpuz, the DAP award was for PhilRice’s
“client-centric service, specifically serving the country’s rice farmers” (above
main image appears with her story). Miss Donna explains:
The scoring was based
on the best practice focus areas, which include social and environmental
responsibility, strategic planning and deployment, customer and citizen focus,
and strategic performance management.
That means PhilRice did an excellent job last year in
bringing science to the farmers who texted because they wanted to know more
about rice.
Now, that Focus Award looks at the performance of PhilRice
bringing the recommendations of experts to farmers on their concerns – but does
not look at the farmers’ obtaining Masaganang Ani at Mataas na Kita (Bounteous
Harvest & Bountiful Income, my translation), the dream of PH Agriculture
under Secretary William Dar/Manong Willie.
So:
PhilRice service may be good, but farmer’s performance may be poor – and that
should be the main concern of PhilRice!
Miss Donna mentions that this PhilRice digital platform is
an offshoot of the Open Academy for Philippine Agriculture, OpAPA – which means
the OpAPA is dead. And I cannot accept that.
You see, I was a consultant of PhilRice in 2003, the first
year of OpAPA, a digital knowledge program proposed by then Director General William
Dar of the International Crops
Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, ICRISAT, based in India. With Manong
Willie now PH Secretary of Agriculture, I do believe OpAPA should not simply be
washed away by a flood of ignorance.
I believed
so much in the “open academy” concept of OpAPA that I singlehandedly brainchilded
a workbook titled The Geography Of Knowledge,
198 pages, which I submitted to the incumbent PhilRice Executive Director on 28
December 2003. Sorry, nothing came out of my book and my proposed intellectual
content design for OpAPA, but I still believe that my geography of knowledge is
necessary for the luxuriant growth of PH Agriculture today.
This
time, let me refer to it simply as Digital
Rice. Here are some ideas (superimposed image from Alamy[2]):
Options: You should
not assume it is only rice that PhilRice should be concerned with. Never mind
that IRRI, which is the Mother of PhilRice, is fixated on rice monoculture –
why cannot PhilRice explore rice-based farming systems with other crops such as
corn and beans?
Language: IRRI has
a knowledge bank, extensive – but everything is for someone who knows technical
terms associated with the growing of rice, from heredity (in relation to potential yield), to parent shoot (in relation to maximum tillering capacity that
actually determines the yield), to ratooning
(that increases yield as well as income) – now, nobody talks about ratooning
rice as an option: Why not?
Demos & Trainings:
Certainly, Digital Rice can teach anyone anywhere anything he wants to know,
even show convincingly the physical meaning of Masaganang Ani along with Mataas
na Kita.
We
need Digital Rice!@517
[1]
https://www.philrice.gov.ph/philrice-text-center-recognized-as-govt-best-practice/?fbclid=IwAR1rVwbSOJarFcOB2iZUoU766PHN1jyXh5RKhkxWQI6JEWnJOhztT-5xcvg
Comments
Post a Comment