Communicators For Development, Social Media Should Be At Your Beck & Call!
Of the 5 Os – Obstacles, Opportunities, Options, Outputs and Outcomes – I am talking Options here.
Via email
from Academia, I have just downloaded
Communication For Development And Social
Change, a book edited by Jan Servaes (429 pages). Right under
“Introduction,” Mr Servaes quotes Everett Rogers in 1976:
Development
Communication is the study of social change brought about by the application of
communication research, theory, and technologies to bring about development....
Development is a widely participatory process of social change in a society,
intended to bring about both social and material advancement, including greater
equality, freedom, and other valued qualities for the majority of people
through their gaining greater control over their environment.
Now then, the Mission of DevCom is Social Change, the Vision being Development.
Mr Rogers is saying development is “intended to bring about both social and
material advancement.” Then, the College
of Development Communication, DevCom, of UP Los Baños has not been living up to
the mandate of using communication to help bring about advancement of people
socially and materially!
Nonetheless, I do not agree with “human rights” and “gender
equality.” Village development must be considered above human rights, that is, the ultimate application of the United
Nations’ Principle of Sustainability:
economic viability, technical feasibility, environmental soundness, and social
acceptability.
ComDev or DevCom, we are talking of development of villages. Remember, “It takes a village to nurture a
child.” In the Philippines, we are better off than many countries in terms of
gender equality, the female here already more
respected than the male, alleluia!
We should now be quite busy with social media for social
development. Milena Peisker has the perfect description of what ComDev should
be all about in the very title of her 2011 review article, “The Communication
of Participation” with the subtitle, “An Exploratory Study Of The Effects Of
Social Media On Social Change[1],”
and among other things, she concludes: “Social media does not cause social
change.” I qualify:
Only
society can cause social change, but social media should be able to catalyze social change.
That is what I am
after. So, now I’m looking at Facebook and my favorite social media, blog. I use Blogger.com. Facebook and/or Blogger.com, we should all be able to
cause society to proceed to change, in this case, in PH Agriculture.
So, currently I have this new blog, I, The Wizard Of Os, where you are reading
this 517-word essay (including title). Blogging is where I have persisted,
since 2005, in trying “to change the world,” if only the world of thinking.
Which brings me to the “New Thinking for Agriculture”
espoused by PH Secretary of Agriculture William Dar/Manong Willie, the thinking
encouraged emanating from what Manong Willie calls “The Eight Paradigms,” which
are: modernization, industrialization, export promotion, consolidation of
farms, infrastructure, higher investments, legislative support, and roadmap
development.
Cultivating
social change in agriculture via social media is actually Goliath challenges,
plural. Are you Davids enough to join? Use your head!
Differently,
to encourage you, look at the above image, from Shutterstock.@517
Comments
Post a Comment